What was a criticism made of George H.W. Bush's New World Order?
A. It imposed too many restrictions on subjugated nations.
B. It was vague and its parameters were hard to define.
C. It involved a heavy level of funding for military efforts.
D. It established the rule of law but did not incorporate humanitarianism.
E. It implied too much reluctance toward U.S. intervention in foreign affairs.
Answer (3)
I believe the answer is: b.It was vague and its parameters were hard to define.
According to his proposal in the new world order, President bush wanted to create a Global governance where one country is elected as a leader that has a jurisdiction over the legislation in other countries. His wording was extremely vague and could easily misinterpreted as an effort to control the world.
There were many criticisms aimed at the policies supported by George H. W. Bush's policies which could be considered his "New World Order." In this policy George H.W. Bush sought to establish the United States as the international leader in the international system and that the U.S. would support the greater imposition of the rule of law as shown by the U.S. defense of Kuwait in the First Persian Gulf War. Therefore, it could be argued that a criticism might be that it (D) established the rule of law but did not incorporate humanitarianism.
One criticism of George H.W. Bush's New World Order was that it was vague and its parameters were hard to define. This lack of clarity created concerns about the implementation and effectiveness of U.S. foreign policies. Ultimately, critics highlighted the difficulties that arose from the ambiguous nature of the concept.
;
