HRS - Ask. Learn. Share Knowledge. Logo

In History / College | 2025-07-03

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), why did Ernesto Miranda say his Fifth Amendment rights were violated?
A. He had been stopped and searched without a judge issuing a proper warrant.
B. He had been tried for serious crimes without a grand jury issuing an indictment.
C. He had confessed to crimes without being reminded of his right to avoid self-incrimination.
D. He had been jailed without being informed of the charges against him.

Asked by lane94613

Answer (2)

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), Ernesto Miranda claimed his Fifth Amendment rights were violated because he confessed to crimes without being informed of his right to avoid self-incrimination. This case established the requirement that suspects must be informed of their rights before interrogation, reshaping law enforcement practices. The ruling ensured that confessions are voluntary and legally admissible. ;

Answered by GinnyAnswer | 2025-07-03

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), Ernesto Miranda claimed his Fifth Amendment rights were violated because he confessed to crimes without being informed of his right to avoid self-incrimination. The Supreme Court ruling established the requirement that suspects must be informed of their rights before interrogation. This changed law enforcement practices by ensuring confessions are voluntary and legally admissible.
;

Answered by Anonymous | 2025-07-04