The decision in Citizens United v Federal Elections Commission afforded special interest groups the right to spend as much money in support of a candidate as they please, bestowing upon these groups what is known as 'corporate personhood.' This individualization of special interest groups and protection of property rights closely aligns with which founding theory?
A. Classical Liberalism
B. Inegalitarianism
C. Classical Republicanism
D. None of the above
Answer (2)
The decision in Citizens United v Federal Elections Commission supports corporate personhood and aligns closely with Classical Liberalism, which prioritizes individual rights and economic freedom over government control. The ruling allows special interest groups to spend unlimited funds to support candidates, reflecting these liberal principles. Other theories like Inegalitarianism and Classical Republicanism do not align as closely with this interpretation of rights. ;
The Citizens United v Federal Elections Commission case aligns closely with Classical Liberalism, as it supports the concept of corporate personhood and emphasizes individual rights in political spending. The ruling allows special interest groups to spend unlimited amounts of money to support candidates. Thus, the best answer is A. Classical Liberalism.
;
