The claim that "Limited Altruism is actually less effective than doing nothing" is not a genuine objection to altruism, as it critiques the effectiveness of limited efforts rather than challenging the philosophy of altruism itself. Other options raise valid concerns regarding altruism's impact on self-perception and societal dynamics. Thus, this specific statement differs from the true objections provided. ;
The correct answer is option C, which states that 'Limited Altruism is actually less effective than doing nothing.' This statement critiques the effectiveness of partial altruistic actions rather than addressing the philosophy of altruism itself, making it stand apart from the other objections. The other options present valid concerns regarding altruism's implications and societal impacts.
;