Which statement explains the difference between using the PAN-OS integrated User-ID agent and the standalone User-ID agent when using Active Directory for user-to-IP mapping?
A) The PAN-OS integrated User-ID agent consumes fewer resources on the NGFW's management CPU.
B) The standalone User-ID agent consumes fewer resources on the NGFW's management CPU.
C) The standalone User-ID agent must run directly on the domain controller server.
D) The PAN-OS integrated User-ID agent must be a member of the Active Directory domain.
Answer (2)
The correct statement explaining the difference is option A: the PAN-OS integrated User-ID agent consumes fewer resources on the NGFW's management CPU. This is because it operates directly within the firewall's management interface, leading to more efficient resource usage. The standalone User-ID agent, on the other hand, operates separately and can demand more resources.
;
When working with Palo Alto Networks' NGFW (Next-Generation Firewall), understanding the different methods of user identification for network security is crucial. The question tackles the user-to-IP mapping using two different agents: the PAN-OS integrated User-ID agent and the standalone User-ID agent.
Let's explore the differences and answer the question regarding their use with Active Directory:
PAN-OS Integrated User-ID Agent :
This agent is built directly into the NGFW and does not require installation on a separate server.
It utilizes the firewall's resources, particularly the management CPU, making it a more resource-intensive option compared to the standalone User-ID agent.
As it resides within the NGFW, it does not need to be installed or operated on a domain controller.
Standalone User-ID Agent :
This is a separate software installed typically on a Windows server, and although it can run on a domain controller, it is not a requirement.
It operates independently of the NGFW, which means it usually consumes fewer resources on the NGFW's management CPU, making it an efficient option in resource management.
The agent collects and maintains user information separately, alleviating some load from the NGFW.
Chosen Option Explanation :
Based on the description above, B) The standalone User-ID agent consumes fewer resources on the NGFW's management CPU is the correct choice. This statement correctly acknowledges the resource management benefits of using a standalone agent, as it operates separately from the NGFW, unlike the integrated User-ID agent which relies on the firewall's resources.
In summary, choosing between these agents depends on your resource availability and network setup, but opting for the standalone agent often provides better resource allocation and management on the NGFW.
