A newspaper editor who wrote a column stating it was immoral for the United States to be involved in a war could be convicted of violating which of the following?
A. Sedition Act
B. Espionage Act
C. Schenck decision
D. Selective Service Act
Answer (2)
The newspaper editor could be convicted under the Sedition Act for stating that it was immoral for the U.S. to be involved in a war. This law criminalized speech that criticized the government and its military actions during war. The Espionage Act, while related, primarily addresses issues of espionage rather than open dissent against war involvement. ;
The newspaper editor could be convicted under the Sedition Act for declaring U.S. involvement in a war immoral. The Sedition Act, established in 1918, made it illegal to criticize the government during wartime. Other laws mentioned do not directly address the act of criticizing government war policies.
;
